Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter SofoTex RSS Feeds Follow Us Login or Register

Atomic Mail Sender

 

Atomic Mail Sender reviewReviews for Atomic Mail Sender


11111 Atomic Mail Sender reviews


WHAT A WAIST OF MONEY. no wonder they dont have a money back guarantee because they know they will be out of business :)
DONT BUY IT.... too many good softs are out there with better tec support too.


0 of 23 people found this review helpful
11111 Atomic Mail Sender


We purchased 2 versions of this program as the authors told us they had fixed the bugs and the newer version was a major release. So we paid for a new licence. Guess what? The program still is a piece of shit. The buttons dont work. It does not do what it says it is doing. We tested sending some emails to our own emails, they work. The throttling does not work. Our ISP kicked us off the air.

Just lousy all over.

We asked AMS to fix i January when they put out a new release they said it would be finished in March. We are now up to May and still the same lousy excuses.

One thing is for sure we paid for 2 licences that are worth nothing!

DONT BUY THIS PROGRAM IT'S CRAP!


4 of 31 people found this review helpful
11111 Atomic Mail Sender


This software is created and marketed by the Chinese. Customer Support is non-existent. All they want is your $79.95. Emails sit in a "Delivering..." mode for hours without being delivered. Internal SMTP server DOES NOT WORK, these folks cannot communicate with their own user base, how do you think their communication software works?

Bottom Line...Stay away from this crap and save your $79.95!


2 of 55 people found this review helpful
55555 Really good


I'm completely agree with the previous author - I stopped with Atomic Mail Sender for sending out our weekly newsletter


4 of 70 people found this review helpful
55555 Best bulk mailer


We tested 10 bulk mailers. This one is easy to use. (And this one works!) It comes not with many options but we dont need the options that you can find in the expensive programs.


5 of 63 people found this review helpful


 
 

ReviewWrite a Review

poor 2 3 4 excellent


Type the letters and numbers shown on the left into the box on the right (this is to prevent automated submissions).
security image